GREEN COAL? NOT
The following is taken from: Rachel's Democracy & Health News #984, Nov. 6, 2008
By Peter Montague
As we search for solutions to global warming and toxic contamination, we can compare technologies,
intending to select the least harmful. In recent years, scientists have developed two sets of criteria that we
can use to judge the "greenness" of competing technologies. The first is called "The 12
principles of green engineering" and the second is "The 12 principles of green chemistry."
Both sets of principles were developed by teams of technical experts and published in peer-reviewed
journals. They are now widely understood and endorsed. Most importantly, they offer ordinary people, as well
as experts, a way to decide which technologies are worth supporting and which ones should be phased out or
never developed at all.
You can find both sets of principles listed on the "Green Principles"
Is Coal Green?
Don't laugh. There are major environmental groups who have received major grants to convince the public
that "clean coal" is just around the corner and that we should be investing many billions of dollars
each year in "clean coal." These groups include the Union of Concerned Scientists [2 Mbyte PDF], the
Clean Air Task Force, and the Natural Resources Defense Council [1 Mbyte PDF].
There are roughly 500 coal-fired power plants in the U.S., burning a total of about 1.05 billion tons of
coal each year to produce half the nation's electricity. These plants emit 1.9 billion tons of carbon
dioxide (CO2) each year, which is 1/3 of the nation's annual total CO2 emissions.
Most proposals for "clean coal" focus narrowly on this CO2 problem, intending to capture
CO2 and bury it in the deep earth, thus converting it from our problem to our children's
The "other" wastes from burning coal
In addition to 1.9 billion tons of CO2 released by coal-burning power plants each year, another
120 million tons of toxic wastes are created (so-called coal ash, or coal combustion waste [ccw]). These 120
million tons of waste, produced annually, will remain toxic forever, and they have to be put somewhere.
"Clean coal" advocates tend to give lip service to this other 120 million tons of toxic waste.
Their preferred solution for these toxic wastes is to capture them and bury them in shallow pits in the ground
called landfills or "surface impoundments." Unfortunately, all landfills and surface impoundments
eventually release their contents into the local environment, so storing coal wastes in landfills and surface
impoundments is just another way of passing these problems along to our children. [See "EPA says all
landfills leak, even those using best available liners," Rachel's News #37 (August 10, 1987).]
How toxic is this toxic waste? The 1.05 billion tons of coal we burn each year contain 109 tons of mercury,
7884 tons of arsenic, 1167 tons of beryllium, 750 tons of cadmium, 8810 tons of chromium, 9339 tons of nickel,
and 2587 tons of selenium. These are tremendous quantities of toxic materials and they are produced each year,
year after year. Where do these toxic materials go?
As coal is prepared for burning it is crushed and washed. The coal wash water is "disposed" of at
the mine site, meaning it is dumped into a large bathtub in the ground. Of course sooner or later it leaks out
the bottom of the bathtub, carrying with it each year an estimated 13 tons of mercury, 3236 tons of arsenic,
189 tons of beryllium, 251 tons of cadmium, and 2754 tons of nickel, and 1098 tons of selenium.
During combustion, coal-fired power plants emit into the air each year 52 tons of mercury, 47 tons of
arsenic, 8 tons of beryllium, 3 tons of cadmium, 62 tons of chromium, 52 tons of nickel, and 184 tons of
However, as air pollution control technology improves, more of these airborne toxicants are captured in the
form of a finely divided ash. Coal ash (also called coal combustion waste, or CCW for short) contains large
quantities of toxic metals: 44 tons of mercury, 4601 tons of arsenic, 970 tons of beryllium, 496 tons of
cadmium, 6275 tons of chromium, 6533 tons of nickel, and 1305 tons of selenium. Many of these elements are
toxic to humans and other life-forms in micro-gram quantities.
The ash containing these toxic metals is buried in shallow pits near the coal plants that produced it.
There, rain filters through the toxic ash year after year, leaching out the toxic metals and moving them
downward (pulled relentlessly by gravity) into the soil and eventually into the groundwater below.
You might ask, what's the big deal? These toxicants started out below ground in coal and now they're
ending up below ground again? So what?
You can understand the problem by thinking of a cup of coffee. If you pour water over a few coffee beans,
you don't extract much coffee. The result looks pretty much like a cup of hot water. The good stuff
remains locked up in the beans. But if you grind up the beans into a finely divided powder, then pour water
over them, presto! You get a rich, thick cup of coffee. What has happened is that the surface area of the
coffee beans has been enormously increased by grinding them up -- thus exposing a much larger surface to the
water, allow the good stuff to be leached out into your cup.
Coal is the same. Coal underground is like coffee beans. Water filtering through a solid seam of coal does
not extract much of those toxic metals. But once you mine, crush and burn the coal, turning it into a finely
divided ash (like grinding up the beans, vastly increasing the surface area that can come into contact with
water), then filter rainwater through it year after year after year - presto! You get a rich, thick, toxic
waste capable of poisoning your underground water supply. Placing that finely divided waste into a hole in
the ground with a double liner beneath it -- a modern landfill -- does not prevent, but merely delays, the
release of the toxicants, allowing the present generation of decision-makers to pretend all is well, but
saddling our children with a stupendously large legacy of toxic materials and contaminated water.
If the total weight of coal combustion waste is 120 million tons per year in the U.S., then each of our 500
coal-fired power plants is producing, on average, 240,000 tons of toxic waste each year. If a power plant runs
for 40 years, it leaves behind just about 10 million tons of toxic waste (9.6 million tons to be exact). This
does not include the "overburden," as it is called -- all the dirt that must be removed to get at
the coal. (In the western states, where most of U.S. coal is mined, as much as one ton of overburden waste is
created for every ton of coal mined. In Appalachia, where 7% of U.S. coal is mined, 450 mountains have been
destroyed by mountain-top- removal coal mining. So far, 700 miles of streams have been filled in (destroyed)
by mountain-top-removal wastes in Appalachia.) Then there is acid mine drainage that sours streams below mines
for centuries after mining stops. down. The waste produced by coal mining is enormous and enormously
The 120 million tons of toxic waste also does not include the pollution produced by transporting coal from
mine to power plant. About 40% of all rail freight in the U.S., by weight, is coal.
Another serious waste problem created by coal mining is methane gas. Methane is a greenhouse gas that,
pound for pound, has a warming potential 23 times as great as CO2. Since 1750, human industrial
activities have roughly doubled the natural amount of methane in the atmosphere, and each year for the past 15
years atmospheric methane has been increasing about 1% per year. Ten percent of this methane is contributed by
So how does coal measure up against the green principles? Principle 2 of "green engineering" says,
"It is better to prevent waste than to treat or clean up waste after it is formed." And Principle 1
of "green chemistry" says the same thing, "It is better to prevent waste than to treat or clean
up waste after it is formed." Could it be any clearer?
Given the mountains of unmanageable toxic waste produced year after year by coal mining, transport, and
combustion, we can see right away that coal does not measure up to the standards of "green engineering"
or "green chemistry." Not even close. Even if all the carbon dioxide from coal plants could be
captured and handed off to our children to worry about, clean coal (and "green coal") would remain
nothing more than a public relations gimmick, a fiction, a fraud, a ruse.
Coal is not green. Coal is the color of death.